Who is marburg colloquy

For Zwingli there was room for compromise. Zwingli did not see this as church-divisive, though. Perhaps more important for Zwingli was the great political advantage to having Luther and his followers on his side. Luther, for his part, was highly skeptical of the colloquy specifically because of its political underpinnings. Philip of Hesse, the landgrave, also had political aims in desiring the colloquy.

It would provide a strong Protestant alliance that worked in his favor. Thus it was that Luther agreed to the meeting at the behest of his elector, still with sincere suspicion. After all arrived in Marburg and pleasantries and preliminary matters were discussed, the colloquy began officially on Saturday, October 1, Philip of Hesse was there, and at a table in a living room in the Marburg Castle sat Luther and Melanchthon on the one side and Zwingli and Oecolampadius on the other.

Luther spoke first and among his introductory remarks were these words:. Not as if I were desirous of changing my conviction, which, on the contrary is absolutely firm. Still, I want to present the foundation of my faith and show where the others err. To our contemporary ears this might trigger a strong reaction that Luther was unreasonably stubborn.

Luther agreed, but not without testifying publicly that he disagreed with the writings of these men on the above articles.

For God is able to act far beyond our imagination. Philip of Hesse hoped that they would be able to argue through their issues. However, the meeting failed. Neither reformer could agree and at the end of the debate Luther refused to shake hands with Zwingli. Our hope for the series is that it will give our readers a better understanding of both how the debate happened poorly, for the most part and how the personalities of different leaders influence events in church history.

It can be easy, once an historical figure has been dead for a suitably long time, for great figures of the past to develop a kind of halo-and-stained-glass reputation amongst Christians. But this is not how church history actually works, of course. The leaders of the past, like our leaders today, are sinful human beings with great talents and great flaws.

By the end of this series, we hope that readers will have a better sense of who the reformers actually were and what the movement that became the Reformation looked like in its infancy.

October 5, Church History. Pingback: daily dapoxetine benefits. Pingback: albuterol capsule. Pingback: new york study hydroxychloroquine. Pingback: buy generic hydroxychloroquine. Pingback: horse hydroxychloroquine for humans. Pingback: la in gay dating. Pingback: hydroxychloroquine and blood clots. If Philip wanted the meeting to be a symbol of Protestant unity he was disappointed. Both Luther and Zwingli fell out over the sacrament.